Tendering is a fast-paced and highly competitive process in the security industry, especially for CCTV monitoring tenders, manned guarding contracts or mobile patrol framework agreements. EVERY bid submission must prove your security company is not only compliant but the best fit for the client’s unique environment and risk profile.
It’s no surprise many security firms lean on previous tender responses to save time. But copying and pasting from an older submission—even one that scored highly—is one of the quickest ways to lose marks, fail quality assessments or even get disqualified on compliance grounds in public sector security tendering.
Reusing Security Bid Content: Smart or Risky?
For many security providers, particularly SMEs with limited in-house security bid writing support, reusing bid content can feel like a lifeline. But using outdated or generic responses is a false economy. You might shave off an hour now but lose a six-figure security contract by scoring 5/10 when you could have hit 9/10.
That said, reusing content is not wrong, it just needs to be done in a strategic way. Many successful security firms build bid libraries with strong responses, compliance statements and case studies.
These libraries are gold dust – but only if built systematically and used correctly.
In the security sector, especially when tendering for government and public sector clients, there is a heightened expectation of precision. Each site, stakeholder and specification brings a different set of risks, requirements and considerations. If your response overlooks any of these details, evaluators will quickly identify your submission as recycled or too vague.
What Security Clients Penalise is Reused Content
Clients in the security space, whether it be councils, housing groups or NHS trusts, are used to recycled answers and can spot them a mile off.
Signs of a recycled answers include:
- A mobilisation plan referring to the wrong location, client name or contract start date.
- A case study that focuses on different requirements or site types.
- A response that includes health and safety procedures for a different client’s environment.
- Policies and accreditations uploaded with no explanation of how they relate to this contract.
If your answer references outdated details or fails to speak to the specific risks outlined in the specification, you risk being marked down, or worse, failing a compliance check altogether.
5 Smarter Ways to Reuse Security Bid Content
NUMBER 1: Reframe old content around the new contract’s purpose
Rather than tweaking a paragraph here or there, start by reframing the entire response around what this specific buyer is trying to achieve.
Are they reducing antisocial behaviour in housing estates? Enhancing safeguarding protocols at SEND schools?
You can use existing material as a foundation for each response, but the answer must be written through the lens of this buyer’s goals. This demonstrates alignment and understanding, which most evaluators value far more than generic claims about experience.
NUMBER 2: Refresh terminology to match sector and specification language
Every security tender will have its own tone – NHS trusts will prioritise patient safeguarding and duty of care, housing associations focus on community visibility, universities want professional presentation and student safety.
Even if your service is the same, your language shouldn’t be.
Before reusing content, rewrite it using the terminology, themes and risk language seen in the specification. Mirror the buyer’s language so your submission reads like a direct conversation, not a pre-written advert.
NUMBER 3: Translate compliance into context
Security bids often ask about accreditations – ACS, ISO 9001, Cyber Essentials, etc. But these are only impactful if you explain how they will improve delivery, specifically for this contract.
If you have reused a compliance paragraph, update it with detail such as:
- Our ACS-approved supervisory approach allows for 24/7 on-call escalation, which is essential for this multi-site contract”.
- “We are certified to ISO 45001 and will apply our latest long worker monitoring audit protocols to your community housing estates.”
This approach transfers your compliance from passive to practical.
NUMBER 4: Rotate case study emphasis based on the client’s risk profile
Even if you always use the same three case studies, how you present them should vary. One contract might want to see expertise in dispersing youth-related incidents. Another might be looking for safeguarding protocols for adults with complex needs.
Reusing the same case study is fine, but change the emphasis. Highlight different incidents, outcomes, or KPIs depending on what the client values. This keeps your content fresh, while still using your best examples.
NUMBER 5: Use past failures or challenges to demonstrate maturity
Security buyers want to know how you respond when things go wrong. If you have a past bid response that mentions an issue or you want to use a case study that wasn’t the most successful of contracts, do not hide your mistakes, reframe them.
For example:
“In 2022, we faced higher-than-expected turnover on a similar estate-based contract. In response, we introduced a localised recruitment incentive, which led to 100% retention over the following six months.”
A reframed mistake gives you credibility, demonstrates your drive for continuous improvement and differentiates you from competitors who pretend they have never faced challenges.
Final Thoughts: Reuse with Strategy, NOT Laziness…
Yes, you can reuse previous security bid content, and you probably should. It saves time, improves consistency and helps you scale up bidding activity – but only when done right.
If content is outdated, irrelevant or too vague, you will lose credibility and waste your efforts. Worse, a compliance slip or referencing error could get you eliminated completely.
At Bid Writing Services, we support security contractors in building structured, flexible bid libraries designed for reuse. From safeguarding statements to SIA compliance evidence, we help our clients to develop tailored content that gets the results, time and time again.
Have a security tender submission coming up? Or want to talk about our Security Bid Library service? Why not utilise our expert security tender writers? Contact us at michael.baron@bidwritingservice.com or lauren.moorhouse@bidwritingservice.com to discuss your needs, or, fill out the form below!
Request a Callback
"*" indicates required fields