Mechanical and Electrical (M&E) tenders can be lucrative, repeatable and strategically valuable – but they can also drain time, resources and morale if pursued without proper consideration.
Whether you’re bidding for planned maintenance frameworks, lifecycle replacement works, or reactive M&E contracts, knowing when not to bid is just as important as knowing when to go all-in.
This article provides a fast, practical decision-making process to help M&E contractors and service providers assess bid viability early, qualify opportunities effectively, and protect win rates — without over-analysing every tender.
Why Bid Qualification Matters in M&E Tenders
Bid teams in the M&E sector are often under pressure. Short turnaround times, complex technical specifications and increasingly weighted quality submissions mean that every bid comes at a cost. If you waste your time bidding for a contract that doesn’t suit your growth objectives or that you do not qualify for, you can end up wasting a huge amount of money, time and effort.
Poor bid consideration typically results in:
- Low-scoring technical responses
- Pricing that doesn’t reflect risk
- Overstretched delivery teams
- Reduced overall win rates
A structured bid/no-bid process ensures you focus on opportunities where you are competitive, compliant, and credible — not just busy.
Step 1: Is the M&E Opportunity Strategically Right?
Before diving into the tender documents, start with a high-level strategic filter.
Ask yourself:
- Does this opportunity align with our core M&E services?
- Is this contract within our geographical coverage?
- Does the contract size match our operational capacity?
- Is this a target client or sector?
- Will this contract help to develop my business in the intended way?
Red Flags to Look Out For
This is a very important stage to look out for red flags. To avoid contractual issues or incorrect bidding strategy, you should be looking for:
- Significant scope outside your normal M&E offering.
- Contract values that would overstretch supervision or supply chain.
- Locations requiring extensive subcontracting.
- Clients with unrealistic mobilisation expectations.
If the opportunity fails at this level, stop early. No amount of bid writing can compensate for a fundamental strategic mismatch and your business will only suffer long-term should you win a contract with this failing criteria.
Step 2: Can You Meet the Technical M&E Requirements?
M&E tenders are increasingly detailed, particularly around compliance, performance, and asset management. Clients will often have a list of non-negotiable requirements they want and will often reject any supplier that does not hold the required standards before even glancing at your bid responses.
You should quickly test:
- Do you hold the required accreditations?
- Can you evidence similar M&E contracts?
- Are the specified systems aligned with your expertise?
Common Technical Requirements in M&E Tenders
- NICEIC/ECA/SELECT registration.
- Gas Safe/F-Gas certification.
- Experience with BMS, HV/LV, or specialist systems.
- Planned Preventative Maintenance (PPM) scheduling capability.
- Asset lifecycle planning and condition surveys.
If the tender requires niche expertise you cannot evidence credibly, this will show in the evaluation – regardless of how well the response is written.
Step 3: Are You Competitive on Experience?
Due to the risks involved in M&E works, most contracting authorities place significant weighting on previous experience and case studies. This allows them to understand exactly what experience your business and staff has and how that can be applied to the proposed work within the bidding contract.
Ask:
- Do we have directly relevant examples?
- Can we demonstrate scale and complexity?
- Can we evidence how we completed these works and the outcomes?
- Are our clients recent and credible?
A Simple Experience Test
If you struggle to identify at least three strong, comparable M&E case studies within 10 minutes, the bid is already high risk.
Evaluators expect:
- Similar building types (e.g. healthcare, education, commercial).
- Comparable asset values.
- Clear performance outcomes (compliance, energy savings etc).
Generic examples that are not directly correlated with the proposed works, or stretched examples that perhaps exaggerate your previous scope of work will all score poorly. Contracting authorities will be looking for evidenced case studies, backed by contract specifics and the contact details of previous clients – if you cannot provide these, the tender should be reevaluated.
Step 4: Can You Price It Profitably and Competitively?
Tenders are scored on both price and quality – with quality scoring highly due to the risk factor. Although price is rarely the only deciding factor, in M&E tenders it is still always critical.
You should be considering how much money you are willing to spend throughout this contract term, whether you have a contingency budget to ensure emergencies or underestimations are catered for, and above all, you need to guarantee that your business will survive the length of the contract.
Early pricing sense-checks should include:
- TUPE implications.
- Call-out response models.
- Asset condition and backlog risk.
- Materials volatility.
- Compliance and certification overheads.
Warning Signs on Price
- Incomplete asset data.
- Unclear scope boundaries.
- Unrealistic response times.
- Fixed pricing with high unknowns.
If pricing assumptions are too speculative, you risk either pricing yourself out or winning unprofitably.
Step 5: What Is the Quality Threshold?
Many M&E tenders now apply minimum quality thresholds (often 60–70%). Quality is ranked far higher than it used to be, due to risk factors in the M&E field and contract security.
Ask yourself:
- Do we have time to write a strong quality submission?
- Can we tailor responses to the client’s assets and risks?
- Do we have the internal input required from operations and compliance?
If the answer to these is no, your bid will likely not hit the right marks in the quality section. However, there is an easy fix to this – hiring external bid writers either to assist your existing busy team or complete the bid on your behalf is a great way to ensure you are maximising quality without wasting time.
Typical M&E Quality Questions Include:
- Planned and reactive maintenance methodology.
- Health & Safety and RAMS integration.
- Environmental and energy efficiency approach.
- Supply chain management.
- Mobilisation and transition planning.
If you cannot resource the quality submission properly, even a strong price will not save the bid and you’ll lose the chance to obtain the contract.
Step 6: Who Are You Competing Against?
Understanding the competitive landscape is a powerful (and often overlooked) qualification step. Many contracting authorities release tenders purely for legislative reasons, when in fact, they already have a supplier lined up. Doing some research into the contract, the contracting authority and the incumbent supplier may help you to decide whether the bid is really worth it.
Consider:
- Is the incumbent rebidding?
- Are large national FM providers likely to bid?
- Is this tender tailored to a specific delivery model?
If you have considered these and you may think your chances low, it’s an important time to step back and consider whether the juice is worth the squeeze.
High-Risk Competitive Scenarios
- Incumbent with strong performance history.
- Frameworks dominated by national providers.
- Pricing-led evaluations with minimal quality differentiation.
To clarify, this doesn’t mean ‘don’t bid’, but it should inform how much effort you invest.
Step 7: Do You Have the Time and Resources?
Finally, assess internal capacity honestly. It’s important to consider your resources and staff capacity through an honest lens, ensuring that this contract will not push you beyond your limits.
- Bid management availability.
- Technical input from engineers.
- Management sign-off time.
- Competing deadlines.
Rushed M&E bids often fail not on capability, but on poor articulation of that capability.
A Simple M&E Bid / No-Bid Checklist
Before committing, you should be able to answer “yes” to most of the following:
- Strategic fit
- Technical compliance
- Strong experience
- Commercially viable
- Achievable quality score
- Adequate bid resources
If multiple boxes remain unchecked, the smart decision may be no-bid.
Final Thoughts
Successful M&E contractors do not win more by bidding more — they win more by bidding better.
A fast, structured bid qualification process protects margins, improves quality scores, and builds a stronger pipeline over time.
At BWS, we feel strongly about helping our clients find the right contracts. If you’d like support reviewing M&E tender opportunities, sense-checking bid strategy, or strengthening quality submissions, working with an experienced bid writing consultancy can significantly improve outcomes — particularly in competitive, compliance-heavy M&E procurements.
For more information, email michael.baron@bidwritingservice.com, james.wignall@bidwritingservice.com, matt.burton@bidwritingservice.com, stacey.crawford@bidwritingservice.com or fill out the form below!
Request a Callback
"*" indicates required fields