How Are Water Hygiene Tenders Scored? Understanding MEAT (Most Economically Advantageous Tender)

Many water hygiene companies assume that cost is the most important factor when bidding for public sector tenders. After all, contracting authorities are under continual pressure to deliver value within tight budgets. However, water hygiene tenders are rarely awarded solely on price. Value in these bids extends far beyond figures on a pricing schedule.

Typically, public sector buyers use MEAT (the Most Economically Advantageous Tender) to evaluate submissions. This approach ensures that contracts are awarded to suppliers who provide the best overall balance between cost, quality, technical capability and added value.

For businesses delivering Legionella control and water hygiene services, compliance and safety are paramount. Understanding how to demonstrate added value within your quality submission, not just your pricing model, can make the difference between winning and losing a contract.

Many suppliers underestimate the importance of quality questions or treat the social value element as a formality. This article explains how water hygiene tenders are typically scored under MEAT and what evaluators are truly looking for.

What Does MEAT Mean?

MEAT is a structured and transparent scoring method that ensures contracts are not awarded purely to the lowest bidder. Submitting a low-cost bid without demonstrating quality or feasibility can often raise red flags during evaluation.

The MEAT scoring process balances price against key factors such as technical competence, innovation, compliance with water hygiene regulations, and the ability to deliver consistent, safe and reliable services.

In water hygiene contracts, compliance and quality responses carry significant weight. Poor performance or non-compliance with HSG274 Parts 1–3 or ACoP L8 can result in serious outcomes such as Legionnaires’ disease, reputational harm and even prosecution. Therefore, evaluators need assurance that your company has the systems, governance and technical expertise to manage these risks effectively.

Typical water hygiene tender evaluation criteria include:

• Price – how competitive and sustainable your pricing structure is compared to others.
• Quality – how effectively your written responses demonstrate compliance, risk control and service capability.
• Social Value – how your organisation supports local employment, apprenticeships, sustainability and community initiatives.

The weighting applied to each section varies between buyers. For example, a local authority water hygiene contract might apply a 60% quality and 40% price split, whereas a housing association may prioritise quality more heavily at 70% quality and 30% price.

Always review the tender documents carefully, as the published weightings should guide your strategy and the focus of your submission.

How is Quality Scored in Water Hygiene Tenders?

The quality section is where you can demonstrate the full extent of your technical competence, service delivery processes and compliance management systems. It is your opportunity to show evaluators that you not only understand water hygiene regulations but actively manage risk through well-documented processes.

Typical quality questions in water hygiene tenders include:

• Explaining your Legionella risk assessment process, in line with HSG274 and ACoP L8.
• Detailing your temperature monitoring and sampling regimes, including reporting and escalation procedures.
• Describing your management of flushing regimes for little-used outlets.
• Outlining your approach to cold water storage tank inspections, cleaning, disinfection and remedial works.
• Detailing your training and competency framework, showing how staff remain compliant with updated industry standards.
• Explaining your incident management procedures, with an example of how you would respond to a positive Legionella sample.
• Demonstrating how you minimise disruption in high-risk environments such as hospitals, schools and care settings.
• Describing your environmental initiatives.

What Do Evaluators Look For?

Evaluators want reassurance that you have robust, auditable systems in place. They look for:

• Clear, step-by-step processes that align with legislation and industry best practice.
• Competent, trained and accredited staff experienced in Legionella risk management and water hygiene testing.
• Strong evidence of past performance showing you have delivered similar services successfully.
• A proactive approach to risk mitigation, communication and continuous improvement.

Generic statements such as “we follow ACoP L8” often score poorly. You should demonstrate how you apply the guidance in real scenarios, who is responsible for implementation, and how compliance is monitored and reviewed.

High-scoring responses often reference digital reporting platforms, internal audit processes, Responsible Persons, and case studies evidencing problem-solving and escalation procedures.

Evidence and Detail

Providing clear, verifiable evidence strengthens your tender submission and increases your chances of achieving top marks. Many suppliers know what evaluators want to hear, but the highest-scoring bids prove compliance rather than simply claiming it.

In water hygiene tenders, this is especially critical for sections relating to Legionella control, incident response, and ongoing compliance monitoring.

For instance, a strong incident management response should describe:

• How a positive Legionella sample would be detected within your monitoring platform.
• The escalation route, including named roles and responsibilities for senior oversight.
• How you would notify the client immediately and what interim control measures you would implement.
• The corrective actions you would recommend, such as shock chlorination, pipework modifications or additional testing.
• How findings are documented, reviewed and used to improve future performance.

The more transparent, evidence-led and process-driven your answers are, the higher your quality score will be.

How is Price Evaluated?

Although quality often carries greater weighting, pricing remains a vital component of water hygiene tender scoring. Most contracting authorities apply a standard formula where the lowest compliant bid receives full marks, and all other bids are scored proportionally.

For example:

• If the lowest compliant bid is £100,000, that supplier receives 100% of the available pricing score.
• If your submission is £120,000 and pricing is weighted at 40%, your score will be calculated proportionally (100,000 ÷ 120,000 = 0.83).
• You would therefore receive 33.3% out of the 40% price weighting.

However, submitting a price that is unrealistically low may trigger clarification questions or even lead to disqualification if deemed unviable.

Why Does Understanding MEAT Scoring Matter?

A clear understanding of MEAT evaluation criteria allows you to focus your time and resources where they will have the greatest impact. For example, if your water hygiene framework tender is scored 70% quality and 30% price, it is far more beneficial to invest in detailed, evidenced quality responses than to focus solely on reducing costs.

Knowing how MEAT works helps you balance value for money with demonstrable quality, compliance, and innovation, which are key factors that public sector buyers prioritise.

Final Thoughts

As experienced bid writers, our role is to ensure that your submission aligns with the buyer’s scoring framework and fully reflects your organisation’s technical expertise. We take the time to understand your water hygiene processes, compliance systems and service delivery methods before translating them into structured, persuasive responses that directly meet evaluation criteria.

If you are preparing an upcoming water hygiene tender or Legionella compliance contract, contact Bid Writing Service today. Our team creates comprehensive, evidence-based tender responses that showcase your strengths, maximise scoring potential, and give you the competitive edge to win in the public sector procurement arena.